Selective Crackdown? CHED Draws Criticism Over Education Policies

Concerns over fairness and consistency inside the Philippine higher education sector are intensifying as critics question the Commission on Higher Education’s handling of underperforming teacher education institutions across the country.

The controversy stems from findings linked to CHED’s 2024 nationwide evaluation of teacher education programs, where more than 100 schools were reportedly flagged for failing to meet required academic standards. Among the issues identified were poor Licensure Examination for Teachers (LET) performance, insufficient faculty credentials, outdated curricula, and weak academic leadership.

Despite the scale of the reported deficiencies, observers claim that many institutions allegedly found non-compliant continue to operate without major sanctions. This has fueled criticism against CHED leadership, particularly against Shirley C. Agrupis, with stakeholders questioning whether enforcement measures are being applied evenly across all institutions.

Particular attention has focused on the treatment of several campuses belonging to a long-established educational institution with a nationwide presence. Supporters argue that these campuses, some operating for more than three decades, possess stable infrastructure, owned properties, advanced computer laboratories, and internationally recognized certifications for students — qualities they believe distinguish them from smaller institutions with more serious compliance concerns.

Within academic circles, speculation has emerged over possible political influences behind certain regulatory decisions. Some critics have raised unverified claims linking the controversy either to the institution’s past connections with former education officials or to alleged relationships between regulators and competing schools. No public evidence has been presented to substantiate these accusations, but the rumors have added to growing frustration among educators and school administrators.

The situation has become more controversial following CHED’s recent recognition of top-performing teacher education institutions during the 2025 EQUATE Awards. Critics argue that while academic excellence was publicly celebrated, promised actions against struggling programs appeared to stall.

For many in the education sector, the issue now extends beyond competition among schools. Observers say the larger concern involves the credibility of CHED’s regulatory responsibilities and whether standards are being enforced impartially.

Education stakeholders continue to call for greater transparency, emphasizing that accountability must apply equally to all institutions regardless of size, political affiliations, or historical connections. As scrutiny increases, pressure is mounting on CHED to clarify its enforcement policies and demonstrate that regulatory actions remain fair, consistent, and free from bias.